The Carolina Cares Bill Is Completely Inadequate

Carolina Cares (or House Bill 662) purports to close the insurance gap and provide health insurance to those who can’t afford it. Yet the bill fails to address the most pressing healthcare concerns, because it does not go far enough to address North Carolinians’ needs.

Free at the point of service

The bill operates on the same faulty logic as much of the current healthcare system: it assumes that people need to “get their skin in the game” by paying some money for healthcare. If it’s free, the bill’s architects claim, people will abuse the healthcare system.

But people already have their skin in this game: it’s literally their lives on the line. Their taxes also fund government healthcare programs, among other things. But more fundamentally, healthcare is a human right, and our healthcare system should aim to provide care to all even if it was expensive.

Luckily, though, studies have found that “there is little direct evidence suggesting that connecting premium costs to health outcomes...will greatly improve health behavior.” In other words, requiring payment has no benefits for health—just for corporate profits. In truth, studies show that requiring payment simply prevents people from seeking any care, not just expensive care. To improve health outcomes, we must aim for a system that is free at the point of service.

But this bill goes the other direction. As the bill stands, those above 50 percent of the federal poverty line would have to pay 2 percent of their monthly income as coinsurance—a provision that not only fails to help the uninsured, but also adversely affects existing Medicaid beneficiaries.

No work requirement

Carolina Cares also contains an unnecessary, fallacious, and cruel work requirement, stipulating that only those who are “employed or engaged in activities to promote employment” are qualified.

To start, this requirement is just more fine print complicating who can and cannot receive care. Those complications, in turn, place an administrative burden on both providers and consumers.

For consumers, the problems arise when employment structures create payment burdens. Seasonal workers or people who are self-employed may fall out of coverage quickly, because the bill stipulates that your coverage is suspended if you don’t pay premiums for 60 days. It also requires consumers to pay all backed premiums before being reinstated, which could prevent those with lower incomes from ever being able to receive Medicaid again.

On the provider side, the administrative work diverts money that could be spent on patients to paperwork. It’s also unlikely that North Carolina will allocate any additional funds to state Medicaid offices—which are, unsurprisingly, already understaffed—lengthening application and enrollment times and further harming Medicaid users.

On top of that, there are more unemployed people than there are jobs in the majority of North Carolina counties—especially the rural ones. The North Carolina Justice Center reports that there are “nine unemployed workers for every job opening” in Hyde County, for instance. These findings aren’t unusual, either. The number of people who are “choosing” not to work is small. Those who don’t have jobs are retired, disabled, or busy parenting or going to school.

And those who were “out of work” were “more likely to be older (aged 51 to 64 years), more likely to be in fair or poor health, have a chronic mental health condition, or a physical or mental functional limitation,” one expert wrote. “It’s possible that some who report being unable to work might be caught up in new work requirements and lose their coverage. That would be a tragedy, because having a disability or illness likely leaves individuals especially vulnerable to deteriorations in health.”

The work requirement also puts those with criminal records at risk. Those who were formerly incarcerated have well-known difficulties finding employment (not to mention housing and other services). Harming their ability to receive healthcare is simply cruel.

Lastly, according to Andrea Callow from Families USA, work requirements are illegal. Instituting them would violate the Americans with Disabilities Act, as it would disproportionately impact people with disabilities—whether or not they receive disability from the government. Medicare was originally designed as a welfare program to provide insurance; adding a work requirement turns it into a punitive employment program.

Dealing with the underinsured

Medicaid expansion with a work requirement will do nothing to address other fundamental failings of healthcare system.

The first is the number of people who are underinsured with terrible, high-deductible plans that prevent them from receiving any real kind of care. To quote from one paper on Medicare and Medicaid:

“As of late 2016, 28 percent of U.S. adults ages 19 to 64 who were insured all year were underinsured—or an estimated 41 million people. This is more than double the rate in 2003 when the measure was first introduced in the survey, and is up significantly from 23 percent (31 million people) in 2014. Rates climbed across most coverage sources, and, among privately insured, were highest among people with individual market coverage, most of whom have plans through the marketplaces. Half (52%) of underinsured adults reported problems with medical bills or debt and more than two of five (45%) reported not getting needed care because of cost.”

Second is all of the other factors that inhibit people from receiving quality healthcare. Insurance only goes so far, because lack of reliable transportation; lack of disposable income to spend on quality housing and affordable food, exercise options, and other factors in good health; inability to take time off work to go to the doctor; and just finding nearby healthcare providers, especially in rural counties, all present sizable barriers. Current trendy options to reduce those, like wellness programs provided by employers, have not been effective.

Aim higher

Often, Carolina Cares supporters claim that we should support the bill because “it’s the only thing that will pass.” But passing a bad bill that institutes work requirements, expands administrative budgets, and backs bad healthcare logic will not help North Carolinians. We must push back against this slide into the kind of thinking that gave us our current, failing system, and demand something better.

Heather Kim and Ross Gains
NC Piedmont DSA members